The Role of AI in Search: Hype or Game-Changer?

Artificial intelligence is transforming industries at pace — and search/recruitment is no exception. From CV screening to predictive analytics, AI tools are now woven into many aspects of the hiring process. But when it comes to finance recruitment, where precision, nuance, and trust are everything, does AI genuinely improve outcomes — or is it more hype than help?

Efficiency, Yes — But Not a Silver Bullet

AI-powered tools can add real value at the top of the hiring funnel. Automated CV screening, for example, speeds up shortlisting and reduces administrative overhead. Some platforms also offer candidate matching based on job description parsing and keyword analysis. These tools can save time — but they don’t replace the need for judgement and can also be gamed. In ‘high-finance’ roles, where context, cultural fit, and stakeholder expectations matter as much as technical skills, automation alone rarely tells the full story.

Bias In, Bias Out

One of the major concerns with AI in recruitment is the potential to reinforce bias. Algorithms are only as objective as the data they’re trained on. If past hiring decisions have skewed toward particular profiles — based on background, education, or career path — AI tools can perpetuate those patterns rather than disrupt them. For finance functions that value diversity of thought and experience, this presents a clear risk. 

One way to solve this problem is divide your search into ‘segments’ and ask AI to assess each batch of CVs against specific diversity (or other) criteria. What happens if someone with a ‘better’ CV comes along in a later batch? It’s not easy!

Limited Value in Senior Hiring

While AI has a place in high-volume hiring, its impact at the senior end of the market is more limited. Hiring a CFO, a Co-Head of Investment Banking or Head of FP&A isn’t about keyword matches — it’s about leadership style, commercial acumen, and strategic alignment. These are nuanced, human-driven assessments that can’t be automated and evolve constantly. At best, AI might support market mapping or help surface passive candidates — but the decision-making remains human-led.

A Tool, Not a Strategy

The most effective use of AI in finance recruitment is as a tool within a broader, relationship-led hiring strategy. It can support search firms and internal talent teams with sourcing and screening — but it doesn’t replace the need for real conversation, deep understanding, and instinct. In a market where top finance talent is both scarce and discerning, the human touch still carries weight.

AI is undoubtedly changing parts of the recruitment process — making it faster, more data-driven, and in some cases, more consistent. But in front-office finance, where the stakes are high, the roles as scarce as they are complex, AI is a supplement, not a solution.

‍